October 16, 2025 · 50:49

SCOTUS oral argument in LA v. Callais has shown some refuse advancement.

Constitutional LawBible & Theology

Show notes

0:00 - 15:00. Genesis 1:27-28. Mankind’s effort to decimate the distinctiveness between men and women is ultimately self-destructive. 15:00 - 31:00. SCOTUS oral argument in LA v. Callais has shown some refuse advancement. 31:00 - 48:00. God is the one who established absolutely necessity for biblical manhood and womanhood. | 1-800-326-4543 ext. 345 To donate call : 877-616-2396 Video Clip Links Ketanji Brown Jackson Janai Nelson

References & links

Phone lines mentioned

1-800-326-4543 ext. 345
877-616-2396
19784885051
19784895777

Full transcript Auto-generated · 8,533 words

Transcribed with OpenAI Whisper (base.en). Timestamps are approximate. Lightly cleaned for readability; quotations from on-air callers may include filler words. Use the audio player above for the authoritative recording.

0:00Darkness is not an affirmative force.
0:03It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light.
0:07This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
0:11It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite.
0:15Delivery people out of the bondage of mainstream media.
0:18And the philosophies of this world.
0:20God has called you and me to be his ambassador.
0:24Even in this dark moment.
0:26Let's not miss our moment.
0:29And now the Hamilton Corner.
0:33Good evening, everybody.
0:34Welcome to the Hamilton Corner.
0:36Abraham Hamilton the third here joined by the corner contingent right across from me,
0:42my man, 100 grand who is not here.
0:45Trick, y'all.
0:47Right across from me today is our friend in neighborhood.
0:51What a holic Mr. Marty sparks who I must say his shirt is matching mine a little bit today
0:57in the same hue, same shade.
1:00Bobbie's not here to crack on my shirt, it's not going to look like a picnic table blanket.
1:09I like picking the baskets.
1:11Booboo boy.
1:12Yeah.
1:14In the screening room we have produced extraordinaire often imitated never duplicated the real J. Mac.
1:19Ladies and gentlemen, we're ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program.
1:22At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you are making your transition from your
1:27part time jobs where you generate an income to your full time jobs where you cultivate an outcome.
1:32And as you do so, I'd like to encourage you to do so with intentionality, understanding the primacy
1:39that God places on family. You know, man, there is an ethos that is available to us as members of
1:52of God's eternal family that drives us to transcend the partus and rancor that permeates our nation
2:00currently.
2:01I posted on social media just the other night after I got home.
2:04So I was just reading up on some stuff and I posted about RFK Jr. as HHS secretary and I
2:13just simply posed this question.
2:15I wonder what the response would be to RFK Jr.
2:18Jr's tenure with his vaccine stance and all if he had been appointed by a appointed by a
2:23Democrat president, you know, it just and I posed it. The question really has a thought
2:34experiment to invite people who follow me on social media to weigh in and many people
2:38weigh in and the responses were well were very thoughtful and it's just one of those
2:45things that just reiterated for me the necessity of the Christ follower having a kingdom centric
2:53ethos. And it refused to be bogged down by the features of partisan ship that kind of drive
3:03what's happening now. You know, I'm looking forward to joining the family of God and in
3:09in Farmerville, Louisiana at Darbonne Church of Christ
3:14at this weekend, starting tomorrow evening, by the way.
3:17And one of the things I plan to move,
3:21I plan to address to some degree,
3:23is the reality that God expects his body to be his body.
3:27And one of the things that has happened in our society
3:31is that things that God has ordained the church to do
3:34and established our constitutional republic
3:36with democratic features to allow us the liberty
3:38to accomplish them, we've kind of ceded that ground.
3:41And we simply wait for politicians or judges or courts
3:47or other to do things that the body of Christ
3:51is supposed to do, man.
3:52We're supposed to be baking disciples.
3:53We are the ones that should understand God's view
3:56of the family and the opportunity that we have
3:58through the family.
3:59We are the ones that should understand how the Lord
4:01has comprised his body.
4:03And when he says that the Christian is to do good
4:05to everyone, but especially the household of faith.
4:12That's what God expects of his body, man.
4:14And it's time for us to stop talking about going to church
4:17and to be the church.
4:19So when I say on a daily basis,
4:21what goes on in your house is far more important
4:23than what goes on in the White House.
4:24Guys, it's simply true.
4:26The things that transpire in the White House
4:27are very important, no doubt about it,
4:30but they should not be more important to you and me
4:33than what we do in our homes on a daily basis.
4:37We must embrace God's view of his world
4:40and recognize what we have the opportunity to do.
4:43and be a part of his commission,
4:45starting right in the home,
4:46starting right in our home.
4:48So as you are making your transition at this very moment,
4:52I encourage you to do it with intentionality
4:55and welcome the potency of the grace of God
4:58to govern your engagement.
5:01And you be a part of God's solution
5:05and not fan the flames of frankly,
5:09the effectless partisan rancor that has permeated our country.
5:12To the word of God we go.
5:15And this is something that has been on my heart
5:17for quite some time when I was spent some time
5:19talking about it now.
5:20Genesis chapter one, in the very beginning,
5:24this is what Jesus affirms later is recorded in Matthew
5:27chapter 19 as he feels a question concerning marriage.
5:32But in Genesis chapter one, God says something.
5:35And when we as human kind reject the truth of God's word,
5:40of God's word, we do so to our own detriment. We do so to our own detriment. Genesis 1,
5:50verses 27 and 28, this is what God's word says. God created in his own image, in the image of God,
6:00he created him male and female. He created them. God blessed them, and God said to them,
6:10be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and rule over the fish of the sea
6:17and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.
6:26Guys, right at the very beginning of the scripture in the book of beginnings,
6:31throughout the entirety of God's word from Genesis through Revelation,
6:36He consistently affirms the reality that the maximized human expression of his image is reflected in
6:47authentic masculinity and authentic femininity. Male say it to say it better,
6:54their maleness and femaleness is God's idea. It is God's design. It's not a feature of human
7:08will. It is not a sociological construct. It is hardwired into us by the designer. God
7:18made mankind in his image. He made them both male and female, male and female equal in quality
7:30before and high and holy God qualitative equals while simultaneously complementarily distinct
7:38from one another. This is why it doesn't matter how many surgeries one undergoes. It doesn't matter
7:46how many hormones, one in jests, it doesn't matter how many chemicals, one consumes, it doesn't really
7:54frankly matter how one may think they feel internally. A male will never become a female,
8:02never. It will never happen. A female will never become a male. It will never happen.
8:11manus and femianus is determined at a D and at the DNA level literally on the code that
8:21is written on you before you were ever visible to anyone determines who you are the fact that
8:32you may be you know middle age and balding that was in your code when you were conceived
8:38if you're, you know, it's never, it's never going to change.
8:43But what we have done in many ways, you know, and, and, and, and, and this is a good way
8:47to present this analogy.
8:48Oh, while ago I said, and it struck me one day, I was in a mall.
8:53This is years ago.
8:54This, this probably, I don't know, this is before Hurricane Katrina.
9:00And I was in a mall and I just happened to go by Abraham, Crombie and Fitch.
9:04And I never went going by that store and, you know, they had their models.
9:07If you watch it, you see my air quotes in the air.
9:09And basically you got people standing in the hall
9:11and standing in the mall and underwear.
9:14And they're modeling bathing suits, you see.
9:16They're modeling them.
9:17But it's real people.
9:18They've hired models.
9:20And I was like, man, we live in a panogrified society
9:23to where the objectification of the human body,
9:26it's everywhere.
9:30If you happen to try to take in the sports
9:31of anything somebody, they might be trying to sell
9:34motor oil and you got a naked woman on the TV.
9:36We got hamburgers, we got nakedness on the TV.
9:41I said, man, we live in the pornography society.
9:43It's so pornography, but we don't even understand
9:47what imagery is reorienting our minds
9:50and drawing our attention.
9:52It's not just the hardcore smut stuff.
9:56We have a regular, almost an obituated pornography society.
10:03Similarly, we live in a feminized society.
10:08And I want to be clear on what I mean
10:11when I say a feminized society,
10:13because I was asked before when I was speaking
10:15out of place and asked me,
10:16Abe, do you think there's a war on men?
10:19And my answer seemed to shock the people in attendance.
10:23I said, well, yes, you can describe this as a war on men,
10:27but I would say that the war on men
10:29is a subset of the satanic war on God's image bearers.
10:35That the war is to try to feminize men
10:38and to masculinize women and to reduce all of mankind
10:43to an indecipherable, interchangeable amalgamation
10:47of human group.
10:49And that was my answer because if you look at the various
10:52features of our society, and I've made this point
10:56on the show before, much of the celebration of womanhood
11:00in our current culture really is a celebration of women
11:05who seek to embrace various levels and degrees
11:08of masculine and characteristics.
11:11And the same is true on the opposite side.
11:12I mean, how many times do you see, you know,
11:15this man is in tears in touch with his feminine side?
11:17Listen, the only feminine side I got is named Maria.
11:20She's called my wife.
11:24And it's simply because God made me be a man.
11:27And the ultimate objective though,
11:28and this is what people fail to realize, John, John 10,
11:32the thief comes only to steal, kill, and destroy.
11:37when you, not you individually, but when we as mankind, that we are deluged with continuous efforts to erode God's design for mankind, continuous efforts to twist God's image-bearers, which really means that as bears of God's image, we ultimately, especially as we're born again, are called to image God.
12:04God. When there is a consistent, unrelenting, incessant effort to erode God's image bearers,
12:13the ultimate objective is for our own destruction. It's for our own destruction. So we'll have
12:21conversation about things, conversations about things that used to be obvious, you know, that
12:27bone density, physicality, muscular structure, things of that nature, that God in our very
12:32bodies echoes the fact that he's made us to be distinct.
12:36That distinctiveness indicates that distinction isn't just meant to be there for observational
12:42purposes, it's to be functional.
12:45It's obvious by our makeup that one of us would be more naturally inclined towards protection.
12:54One of us is more naturally inclined toward nurture.
12:57That's just the reality.
12:58Now of course there are always exceptions to things but we need to be honest about what
13:02is an outlier and what is normative.
13:05Sure, you have tall women,
13:08you have Asia Wilson, for example,
13:10and it's a very good basketball player,
13:12but on average, generally who's taller?
13:16And while we're on that topic,
13:17even though you have tall women,
13:19usually the tallest of men con, usually is in the male form.
13:25You often have six, seven, six, eight women,
13:27and then some in playing basketball, for example,
13:30which is actually even a basketball rarity.
13:32Some of the tallest basketball players
13:34around 6-3-6-4 women basketball players.
13:36When the tallest male basketball players
13:38are regularly seven feet tall.
13:39Victor Winminyama who is still growing apparently,
13:42is seven seven.
13:45Steth.
13:47And here's the thing that we miss.
13:50Our society has intentionally perverted the complimentary,
13:55God ordained distinctiveness to make that the enemy.
13:59It's evil if you say men and women are different.
14:02No, it's not.
14:04It's not only natural, it's wonderful.
14:08God has made me as a man, and my body does things
14:12that women's bodies do not do.
14:14Glory to God for that.
14:17But if we continually reject that and look for ways
14:20to try to undermine, and I'll say it,
14:22pervert God's good and glorious design,
14:26we do so ultimately to our own detriment.
14:32So brothers, listen to me.
14:35Embrace the reality that God has made us to be men.
14:38Sisters who are listening to me embrace the reality that God has made you to be women
14:43and let us glorify the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords for what he has done
14:47because it is not only good but it's maximally beneficial for you and I to function within his order.
15:01A discipleship minute with Joseph Parker in Exodus 1 is a wonderful story of two little midwives
15:08Shippen Pua who Tferal told them,
15:12kill the baby boys when they're born.
15:14And they had it in their heart, they just knew this is wrong.
15:17And their perspective was, we're not gonna do this
15:20because this is against God's will, and they refuse to do it.
15:23What wonderful role models, Shippen Pua,
15:26are not only for pastors, but for every believer
15:28in every context because it is always gonna take courage
15:32to really follow Jesus accurately.
15:34And it's one of those things where I believe absolutely
15:37every believer should diligently say,
15:39Lord, show me what you want me to do to help end
15:42the slaughter of children in our country.
15:45And I believe God has something for every believer
15:47to do to help.
15:48The devil hates grown folks and he hates children.
15:51The devil can't stand children and he loves to abort them.
15:55So it's important for us to understand
15:57this is serious business.
15:58Being lied into the darkness,
16:08this is the Hamilton Corner, an American family radio.
16:12Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner, Abraham Hamilton
16:14the third here. I mentioned it already, but the Darbonne Church of Christ is located at 1148
16:19Sturlington Highway in Farmerville, Louisiana. The meetings begin tomorrow evening. There'll
16:25be tomorrow, Saturday and Sunday. So looking forward to being there in the area or nearby
16:30the area and willing to come to the area. You are welcome to join us. Now, there have been lots of
16:37of public conversation about Supreme Court Justice,
16:43Katajibrau and Jackson's participation
16:46in the oral arguments in the Louisiana versus Kalei case
16:49that oral arguments were heard yesterday.
16:53And I understand a lot of the visceral reactions
16:58when you hear what was said.
17:01But let me just say,
17:04One, I am not a Katajibrau Jackson fan.
17:09Let me say it that way.
17:11This is the same one who did not know
17:14or refused to say publicly what a woman was.
17:17Okay, so I think that statement alone
17:20is disqualifying the British Supreme Court justice,
17:22especially when you have things like Bostock
17:24that the court heard and you have cases going
17:27before the court like the or arguments in the case
17:29out of Colorado that were heard last week
17:32where you had a Christian counselor
17:37who was challenging a Colorado state law
17:39that says that if she had a minor client
17:42who came to her and said that the client
17:45had unwanted same-sex attraction
17:48and wanted help to rid themselves
17:50of the unwanted same-sex attraction
17:52or they had unwanted dysphoric inclinations
17:57and wanted help to be remedied from that.
17:59Colorado state law says, no, you can't help in that direction
18:01because that would be quote unquote conversion therapy.
18:04It's insane, it's insane.
18:07So that's one of the cases
18:08that Katrina Brown Jackson is gonna hear.
18:10You think it might be important for her
18:11to know what a woman is in order to help, you know?
18:13Anyway, that being said,
18:16I think it is at a minimum,
18:24unhelpful to mischaracterize someone's opinion
18:29that you disagree with, you know?
18:31Is disagreement, the first amendment is profound,
18:33you know, Proverbs 18 talks about
18:35The one who speaks first seems right until another,
18:37another cross comes across examining them,
18:39coming to questions from him, you know?
18:40But we don't do ourselves any good by mischaracterizing
18:43somebody's argument just because we may not agree with them.
18:47So I try and I'm not perfect at this,
18:50but I endeavor to properly characterize the perspective
18:54of people who disagree with me as I disagree with them.
18:57I don't wanna disagree with the caricature
18:59of what they're saying.
19:01I wanna disagree with the substance of their argument
19:04if I have a disagreement.
19:05And if I agree, then I agree.
19:08But if I disagree, I wanna make sure
19:10I am articulating that disagreement accurately,
19:13based on what they say, not a false representation
19:15of what they say.
19:16And I feel like much of the public conversation
19:19about Katanji Brown Jackson's perspective in this case
19:22is a caricature of what she's attempting to argue.
19:25Now let me say this, I still completely disagree with her.
19:29She's flat wrong, she's flat wrong,
19:32but she's wrong for reasons that are different
19:35in the caricature of our representation.
19:36So what am I talking about?
19:37All right.
19:38First, it's important for people to know
19:40what is the case about the Louisiana versus Calais case.
19:46Calais is spelled C-A-L-L-A-I-S.
19:49In this is a case challenging redrawn congressional districts
19:56in the state of Louisiana, which is my home state.
19:59Well, I'll be tomorrow evening, by God's grace.
20:03This dates back to 2022
20:06because you had maps that were drawn
20:09and that were presented.
20:14Then there was a challenge raised in the lawsuit
20:16at the district court level initially
20:18in the state of Louisiana that said the 2022 maps
20:21were insufficient, okay?
20:23The US, I'm not the US, I'm sorry,
20:27the Louisiana state legislature said,
20:28okay, we'll redraw the maps.
20:31And so they redrew the maps for 2024, all right?
20:34Initially, the US Supreme Court was scheduled to hear this case in its last term.
20:40But the court said, you know what, we'll put on this case.
20:43We'll hear the case later.
20:47All right.
20:48The 2022 maps were brought into question because of the potential violation of Section
20:55II of the Voting Rights Act that said that they need, they're needed to be an additional
21:02minority majority minority district in the state of Louisiana because they have six congressional
21:07districts prior to 2022. They only had five. They had one majority minority district. So they say
21:14we need to have another one. Alright, so the 2022 maps were drawn. And say no to 2022 maps violate
21:22the US Constitution. You need to have another majority minority district. So the 2024 maps were
21:27were drawn and they added a modified congressional district
21:32number six. All right, Jeff, if you would put the maps on the
21:35screen for the people so they can see what I'm talking about. All
21:40right. As Jeff is putting those maps up because I want you to see
21:44one because if you're going to talk about something I want you
21:47to know what you're talking about. It's sad that we have people
21:50speaking about things publicly, they don't have a clue what
21:52they're talking about. So if you're watching the show on your
21:54screen to your left, you have the 2022 maps. You'll notice the
21:58the 6th congressional district, the 1st district, the 2nd district in my hometown area in
22:01New Orleans, the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and then the 6th district. The legislature concluded that
22:07that district was potentially violative of the Voting Rights Act, so they then constructed
22:12the 2nd map, which is on your right on the screen, the 2024 map. If you'll notice, you'll
22:19see a difference in the 6th congressional district that reaches all the way up to the northwest
22:26in the state of Louisiana and goes all the way down
22:28from the Shreveport area, potentially,
22:31goes all the way down, slicing horizontally
22:34towards Baton Rouge, Louisiana, yes.
22:37If you see the screen, look at the screen, you can see it.
22:43All right, well, the districts were allowed to proceed.
22:51The sixth congressional district, which was newly created,
22:54had an election in 2024 in which they elected
22:58a long time Democrat, Politico, and Louisiana, Cleo Fields.
23:03Now, if you don't live in Louisiana, that name may not mean anything to you.
23:06But if you are from Louisiana, you know all about play field.
23:14I'll just mention his book, Bad Bed on the Bayou.
23:16He was involved in getting legalized gambling into Louisiana.
23:20He's part of the reason why Harris Casino is downtown and the one who's on Canal Street
23:24right now.
23:26Clio Fields is currently the sixth congressional district congressman in the state of Louisiana.
23:33Long time political.
23:35So this is what the fight is about.
23:37Initially, the state of Louisiana
23:41wasn't opposing the 2024 maps.
23:43Now, the state of Louisiana is saying,
23:47yo, the 2024 maps violate the US Constitution,
23:50the 14th and 15th Amendments.
23:56You have voters in the state that are saying,
23:58no, no, no, no, no, no, we need to.
23:59And this is why I want to make sure
24:02you guys understand what's going on.
24:04You had voters who would sued, who'd say,
24:06said, no, no, no, we need to preserve majority minority congressional districts in the state,
24:11you know, because, you know, representation is important. What is representation is important?
24:19And they and this is the thing that was striking to me, a lot of people paid attention to the
24:22Taji Brown Jackson's comments. But I'm going to play for you one of the attorneys who's representing
24:28the NAACP, I believe, in this litigation and have her name here and she said something out
24:34loud. That was like, wait, nobody puts back on this?
24:36Janai Nelson, who's an attorney advocating to preserve these
24:41districts as they're displayed. And she said something that I
24:44like, wait, what she said, he said that out loud. Because one of
24:49the things that ultimately is being argued, and man, this is,
24:54this is wild to me, you literally have people arguing that
25:01literally, not figuratively, and Kataja Brown Jackson is one I
25:04was included in this.
25:05You literally have people arguing,
25:08well let me be for a specific,
25:10Katarina Jackson was arguing on this side,
25:12she didn't make the statement,
25:13but she was arguing on this side
25:14where the results would be the same.
25:16But this denied Nelson literally said,
25:18no we need to keep these majority minority districts
25:21because that's the only way we can ensure
25:22that the skin color of the person is elected
25:24is the skin color of minority.
25:29I heard that, I'll say, wait, wait, what?
25:31I'm looking around in my office like,
25:33did anybody else hear that?
25:35And this is why I'm presenting this to you.
25:41On the one hand,
25:43because we have to pick as a country man,
25:45and this is one of those moments
25:46where we're long for eternity,
25:51because this stuff is disgusting to me.
25:53We have to decide as a society,
25:55do we really wanna be a people
25:59to where we don't make assessments of one another
26:02based solely on external appearance?
26:05Do we really, let's be honest.
26:07I feel like I wanna look you in the eye,
26:09I want you to look me in the eye.
26:11Let's be honest, do we really want to be a society
26:14that we grow to the place to where we get beyond
26:17making assessments about people, qualitative assessments
26:20about people based on nothing other
26:22than their external appearance?
26:26Do we want to get to the place where we grow beyond
26:30coming to conclusions about people
26:32based on nothing other than their skin pigmentation presented?
26:38That's what I wanna know.
26:40Do we really want to get to that place?
26:42Or do we wanna be a people who give lip service
26:47to being a nation where all men are endowed
26:49by the creator with unalienable rights,
26:51that all men are created equal?
26:52But in reality, we don't really want a society
26:55that functions as if all of us are created equal.
26:58We need to make a decision.
26:59What do we really wanna do?
27:00Because what invariably occurs is that there are people
27:03in our country that they've created industries
27:06and they make money and they have all kind of things built up
27:09on perpetuating the idea that we always need
27:12be divided along skin color lines.
27:15And I'm just sick and tired of it.
27:21Do we wanna be?
27:23Do we wanna be?
27:23Or don't we?
27:25Because if we don't wanna be,
27:26we need to stop talking and acting like we do.
27:29And if we do wanna be,
27:30it's hard time that we act like we wanna be.
27:34And we allow our laws and our policies
27:37and our operations to reflect that reality.
27:42So in this case,
27:44Katajibram Jackson was advocating
27:47for the necessity of maintaining majority minority districts.
27:51And you're going to hear this, Janai Nelson, lady,
27:53who says it out loud.
27:54The reason why we need it is because, you know,
27:57we need votes to come out a specific way.
27:59And you can't trust, regardless of party affiliation,
28:02you can't trust people who have a different skin color
28:05to vote for the people who have the skin color
28:06we want to have.
28:07Guys, I'm going to let y'all hear for yourselves.
28:09But before I go there, I'm going to play the audio
28:12that's been popularly circulated from Kataji Brown Jackson
28:16in the Supreme Court oral arguments,
28:18you won't have video because there are no cameras allowed
28:20in these courts.
28:22But this is the audio where Katajibran Jackson compares
28:26a more melanated people to people who would seek
28:30to benefit from the Americans with Disabilities Act law.
28:34Listen to and watch.
28:36No, just listen to, not watch.
28:37Listen to, clip number one, clip one, go.
28:40I guess I'm thinking of it,
28:43of the fact that remedial action,
28:47absent discriminatory intent,
28:48is really not a new idea in the civil rights laws.
28:52And my kind of paragdigmatic example of this
28:57is something like the ADA.
28:59Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act
29:03against the backdrop of a world that was generally
29:06not accessible to people with disabilities.
29:09And so it was discriminatory in effect,
29:12because these folks were not able to access these buildings.
29:17And it didn't matter whether the person who built the building
29:21or the person who owned the building intended
29:24for them to be exclusionary.
29:27That's irrelevant.
29:28Congress said the facilities have to be made equally open
29:32to people with disabilities if readily possible.
29:37I guess I don't understand why that's not what's happening here.
29:40The idea in Section 2 is that we are responding to current day manifestations of past and present
29:49decisions that disadvantage minorities and make it so that they don't have equal access
29:55to the voting system, right?
29:59They're disabled.
30:00In fact, we use the word disable in Milligan.
30:03We say that's a way in which you see that these processes are not equally open.
30:10Now, most of the people that's sharing that audio, they're saying, oh,
30:14cartagibranch is actually the same, black people are disabled.
30:17Guys, that's, that's a caricature of what she said.
30:19That, that's, I understand the words that she used, but she's trying to make an
30:22argument by analogy.
30:24She's trying to argue that the maintenance of the partial application of the
30:30voter rights act is necessary because the potential agreement is similar to people
30:36who fought for and ultimately had established
30:41the Americans with Disabilities Act.
30:44She's trying to make an analogy.
30:46She's not saying that black people are disabled.
30:50But that's the way a lot of people,
30:51especially in conservative media,
30:52trying to say what she's saying.
30:53That's not what she's saying.
30:54She's making an argument by analogy.
30:55Now, her conclusion is still absolutely wrong.
30:58But I think we need to address the merits
30:59of what's being represented.
31:00And if we don't understand what's being said,
31:02let's just say we don't understand what she's saying.
31:04But don't say that she is saying something
31:06that she is not saying.
31:08All right, now the analogy is hot garbage.
31:11It's complete trash.
31:13But what she's attempting to do is use this illegal analogy
31:17to try to salvage what ultimately was admitted,
31:23that the whole reason why this strange
31:27sixth congressional district was created
31:29is for one reason, popular notions of race.
31:34So Jeff, would you put the pictures up on the screen again?
31:38Katai Jibron Jackson was attempting to say
31:40that there are certain people who are having their votes affected in certain ways, diluting
31:44their votes. And it doesn't matter if the intention is not racial, if the effect is racial,
31:52then you have an analogous circumstance. But later on, you have people saying, yeah, yeah,
31:57well, that strange congressional district, number six that you see, that diagonally goes
32:02from Baton Rouge all up to northwest Louisiana. Yeah, that was created for one reason. The
32:07skin color to people who vote along that corridor. And so
32:11Katarje Brown Jackson is trying to salvage this voting map,
32:15because she knows in my view that the rest of the Supreme Court
32:17justices at least five out of the nine are like, no, we ain't in
32:231965, no more sister. We we we ain't in 1965. This is a whole
32:29new new time in era. And listen, if we want to get to the place
32:33to where we don't make assumptions about people based solely on
32:35skin color, how about we act like it and live like it? But
32:38Katanjia Brown's action is arguing that, well, you know, not much has changed.
32:41We're still the same today as we were in the 60s, which brings you back to the question
32:45I was asking before I played her clip.
32:48What kind of people do we want to be?
32:50Do we want to get to the place where we live, to a skin color that doesn't drive our assessments
32:54of one another, or don't we?
33:00At Wesley Biblical Seminary, we believe God is raising up a movement across our nation and
33:05around the world who hold fast to the inerrancy of scripture and the hope of holiness.
33:10We do this through bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees, certificate programs, and
33:14even training for laypeople.
33:16So whatever your next step is in being equipped for ministry, we're here for you.
33:20And if you believe these are the kind of pastors we need leading churches in the future,
33:24we invite you to think about giving to Wesley Biblical Seminary.
33:27Learn more about us at WBS.edu.
33:31As a nurse, I primarily work with children who are abused and exploited and trafficking,
33:36I frequently see very unfair situations.
33:40We must talk about the issue of abuse.
33:44We can't base our actions on fear.
33:47We have to be faith informed in what we do.
33:50The Dr. Nurse Mama Show.
33:52For more from Dr. Jessica Peck, tune in
33:54at 2 p.m. Central on American Family Radio
33:57or on the podcast page at aFR.net.
34:01What if health care could be more than bills and bureaucracy?
34:04What if it could reflect faith, foster community,
34:07and offer spiritual support?
34:09At Redeem Health Share Ministry,
34:11the mission goes beyond medical bills.
34:14It's about honoring Christ and embracing healthcare
34:17that aligns with Christian values.
34:20Redeem members share medical expenses
34:22through monthly contributions,
34:24supporting one another in a Christ-centered community.
34:27It's not insurance, it's believers helping believers
34:30through financial support and prayer.
34:32And, Redeem Health Share provides freedom for members to select the doctors, hospitals,
34:38and treatments that are right for them.
34:40No networks, no restrictions, just faith-driven care.
34:44From everyday checkups to unexpected medical emergencies, Redeem offers flexible programs
34:49and encouragement-rooted inscripture.
34:52Because your health care should reflect your faith, not compromise it.
34:57at redeemhealthshare.org.
35:34an attorney that's arguing for the preservation of this gerrymandering in the
35:42district congressional district and it's it's man I have the list of the the
35:48Congress members so in district one is represented by Steve Scalise Louisiana
35:52congressional district to in the New Orleans area is represented by Troy Carter
35:55longtime Democrat politician in in Louisiana and Steve Scalise obviously is a
36:01Republican. District three is represented by Clay Higgins, a Republican. District four
36:07is represented by Speaker Mike Johnson in the in the treeport area. District five is represented
36:12by Congresswoman Julia Letlow. And she's on the Congressional Appropriations Committee. And
36:18District six, as I mentioned, is represented by Democrat Congressman Cleo Fields. Alright.
36:25So now I get it because Kataunji Brown Jackson is a Supreme Supreme Court justice. But you
36:31You have this, I want to say her name properly, um, Janai Nelson, an attorney arguing for the
36:39preservation of this gerrymandered maps where she literally during the argument says the
36:45quiet part out loud.
36:46And I want to explain what's going on here because the 14th Amendment includes the Equal
36:52Protection Clause that prohibits treating similar people, similar to situated differently.
36:59All right, the 15th Amendment prohibits race
37:02being a predominant factor in passing legislation.
37:05That's what the 15th Amendment says.
37:06That's what it says.
37:09So the argument for the invalidation of the maps
37:11is saying that these maps violate the 14 and 15th Amendment
37:15of the Constitution.
37:18Well, this attorney arguing for the preservation
37:21of these maps, get ready for this guys.
37:25This is short clip, but listen to clip number two.
37:31Go.
37:32That's right.
37:33And in the state of Louisiana, that analysis was conducted in the Naren case.
37:37And it was clear that regardless of party, white Democrats were not voting for black
37:43candidates, whether they were Democrats or not.
37:47And we know that there is such a significant chasm between how black and white voters vote
37:53in Louisiana, that there's no question that even if there is some correlation between race
37:58and party that race is the driving factor.
38:02Did y'all hear that?
38:04No, y'all know how to translate legal ease.
38:08You have Janai Nelson admitting in legal ease.
38:12Well, the reason why we need this horizontal congressional district stretching from Baton
38:21Rouge all the way to northwest Louisiana is because we need a district that's created
38:27where the primary factor is the skin color of the people who are voting because it is only
38:34by having a district that is comprised majority by the skin color of the people that we want
38:42to vote in particular way, that's the only way we can issue get the skin pigmentation
38:47in the candidate that we want.
38:50They don't hear that?
38:52And she said that we need this district to be determined based on the race as is popularly
38:59utilized the race of the people in the district because regardless of party
39:04the studies have shown that even if you have people that share a party they won't
39:10vote for a candidate who has the the black skin pigmentation did somebody put
39:17me and Marty McFly's the laurie and take me back to 1940 tree I mean what what is
39:24going on here and this this is why I started my questioning the way I did do we
39:29We want to be a people to where we are not making assessments and conclusions and calculations
39:34based upon skin color presentation.
39:38Skinshade presentation.
39:40What is going on with us?
39:41I love 2025, which leads me to what I said before.
39:50We have a lot of people that are talking about, well, you know, we're all together.
39:56We're all made in the image of God.
39:57But there are people, guys, there are people in our country who don't want to go forward,
40:01who don't want to grow.
40:03who don't want to live within,
40:07with the scripture describes
40:08that we're all made in the image of God,
40:09who don't, they don't wanna live there.
40:11They don't wanna live there.
40:14In second Timothy three, among the things
40:16that Paul identifies with what happened in the last days,
40:19that there will be a people who are irreconcilable.
40:22Now I want you to know what I'm saying,
40:24I'm not limited to anybody with skin color,
40:26because there are people, there are people
40:27who are less melanated that say these same things.
40:30Oh, well, you know, check your privilege
40:34and all of these things.
40:35I'm like, what, what am I unable to do
40:39in the year of our Lord 2025
40:40because of my skin color?
40:41Please tell me.
40:42All the people talking about,
40:44hey, you know, whoa,
40:46where we gotta change laws of voter IDs
40:48because the black people can't get IDs.
40:49Y'all wanna know what I did just a week ago?
40:51Y'all wanna know what I did.
40:53You're not gonna believe this.
40:55I had to renew my driver's license.
40:58Shh.
40:59Okay, can you believe that?
41:03Can you believe that?
41:05I mean, as beautifully ebony as my skin is, I was able to actually get an identification.
41:14Y'all know what else? Who will come really close? I have a passport too.
41:22It won't but, guys, I am small as like this. It's like, oh Lord, oh Lord.
41:29This lady said in open court, at the highest court in our nation, that we need Jerry-Mandred
41:38congressional districts because regardless of party affiliation, we have found studies have shown
41:46that party affiliation is not a sufficient incentive for us to get the skin color of the
41:51candidates that we want elected to get elected. We have to pick what we want to be. We have to
41:59choose what we want to be. Do we want to be a people that this is a perpetual thing that pops
42:03up over and over and over and over? This is disgusting, man. So while Katarja Brown Jackson
42:12Basically it's arguing for the same conclusion.
42:15She's doing it in a much more word, salad form.
42:19You know, I know it just comes right out and say,
42:20you know what?
42:22I've studied show, they don't matter what the party is.
42:24They're not gonna vote for the type of skin color we want.
42:27And so we need these kind of districts
42:28to make sure that the skin color candidate
42:30that we want to get elected.
42:32Well, what about the substance of the candidate?
42:34What about the character of the candidate?
42:36What about the platform of the candidate?
42:38What about the policies of the candidate?
42:40Those things are irrelevant.
42:41We're going to literally go to the Supreme Court
42:45and argue for congressional districts and say flat out,
42:48the reason why we want these districts is because we need to make sure
42:51the majority of people that vote, they have a particular skin shade,
42:54because we want candidates to be elected with a particular skin shade.
43:03I'll play it again if you want me to. This is insane, guys.
43:10What do we want to be? What do we want to be?
43:16What do we want to be as a country? What do we want to be as a society?
43:19Do we want to continuously be the people?
43:22It's no different than Joe Biden talking about.
43:28Yeah, this is Jim Eagle.
43:31They're gonna put y'all back and change.
43:33The same tune is hit over and over and over and over and over again.
43:39And it's sickening.
43:40It's sickening guys.
43:42It's sickening.
43:48And you know, one of the major things in it,
43:50you know, let's just be real about this.
43:53One of the major reasons why these things keep cropping up,
43:56I believe, because I believe the Lord gave us an opportunity
43:59in our nation's history for the church to stand up
44:01and unanimously declared with one voice, the Bible says that all mankind are creating in his image
44:06regardless of skin shade. But you know what ended up happening? You ever wonder why we have, you know,
44:11a Southern Baptist nomination as distinct from other Baptist nominations? You all want to know why?
44:15The issue was skin color. That was why you had major denominations in America that divided over
44:22skin color, that created a pseudo-biblical apologetic to defend the sinful predilection for partiality.
44:28It wasn't everybody because it was Christians who led the abolition movement first in England
44:34and then in our own country.
44:36But you know what?
44:37It did not become the majority position of the Christian.
44:39So because the body of Christ did not stand up and declare what one voice largely that
44:44this is ridiculous for us to try to have a nation to a skin color determines the value
44:49of image bearers of God.
44:53Because we had our ancestors in the faith did not slay the giants that we are inheriting
44:57that giant contention in our day.
45:00So, wicked people in our country keep plucking at the same scabs over and over and over again.
45:06We wouldn't have had a critical race theory issue if the body of Christ would have stood
45:09up historically.
45:11But here's the thing, we have an opportunity today to do it.
45:17I'm tired of this foolishness.
45:18Members of the eternal family of God, these are my family members, regardless of their
45:26pigmentation of their skin, how their shade is depicted.
45:30The Bible teaches there's only two types of people,
45:33those who are lost in dead and trespasses and sins,
45:36and those who are redeemed.
45:39The Lord has cobbled together his eternal family
45:41from all ethnos of mankind.
45:45It's one thing to say it's another thing to live in.
45:48And I'm tired of wicked people getting up
45:51in official points of our nation
45:53and saying things like you nine nights Nelson said,
45:56well, you know, you know, boss, we need,
45:59we need these skin color based districts,
46:01know you because we need to make sure that our candidates have the right skin
46:04shade. I'm sick of it, man. I'm sick of it. I'm sick of it. I'm sick of it. I'm sick
46:09of it. And I'm sick of the world standards infiltrating the Lord's church.
46:14Ridiculous. She should be ashamed of ourselves saying that in the Supreme Court.
46:22This is this is insane, guys. We have to decide what we want to be. Do you do you
46:36do you want to be missing else and do you want a country to have the determination
46:42of whose word to be elected to public office,
46:45is not made of something as superficial
46:48and insignificant as skin color?
46:51Are you kidding me?
46:52Look, I'm born and raised in New Orleans.
46:55You wanna know what the skin color of the city council
46:56and the mayors have been in my hometown?
46:59You wanna tell me how the skin color of the mayor
47:01has affected the desired project in the Florida project,
47:03in the Magnolia project, in the Calio project,
47:06in the Melfamy project?
47:08Stop with this nonsense.
47:11Stop with it.
47:12You wanna know the skin color of all the city council people in Detroit and in Philadelphia
47:19and in Memphis, this is insane, man.
47:22I feel like Paul right into the Galatians.
47:26Who has been with you?
47:27That in the year of my law 2025, you're gonna raise your right hand, you're gonna go before
47:32the well in the Supreme Court building and say that we need these districts.
47:42Am I pointing to convey this to you guys?
47:44It stopped letting these people whip you up into a frenzy over this nonsense.
47:48No, listen, you are not going to compel me to embrace your delusion.
47:53I know what y'all talking about in the streets and all of that, that's not where we live.
48:00That's not where we live.
48:04Miss me with all of that nonsense.
48:06And I believe that with every fiber of our being, if the church would have stood up with
48:10one voice, just as William Wilberforce did in England and carried that same phenomenon on
48:16our own country, we wouldn't still be contending with this nonsense today.
48:23But we have the opportunity in our day to say, oh, no, no, no, no, no, no.
48:30The body of Christ shouldn't be divided about it by any notions like this.
48:35Oh, foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you?
48:46And there are people like, and I don't know this is a denied Nelson lady personally.
48:51I don't know Kataji Brown Jackson personally, but there are people in our society who honestly
48:57they have whole industries that have been created.
48:59You know how many people who wrote books and DEI and all of these things with all of that
49:04stuff.
49:05They turn it into industry, man.
49:07They turn it into industry.
49:11But the people of God must be the people of God, that all mankind is made in God's image.
49:23We all are fellow bearers of God's image, and we're going to live like it.
49:33We're going to live like it.
49:34So I don't know where Janae Nelson wants to live, but I want to live in the country where
49:39we don't make determinations as to who's worthy of office based on our skin color.
49:43I want to live in a nation where we evaluate the quality of a person based on their character
49:47and based on the substantive policies that they represented.
49:49They're asking me for my vote to put them in a job that I need them to serve me and my
49:54family in, and my fellow citizens in. And if this is a
49:58combination we want to live in, we need to live like it. I look
50:03forward to the Supreme Court repudiating this nonsense. And I
50:07hope there's a line in the opinion that rebuked your nine
50:09Nelson's absurd statement, because it is it is absolutely absurd.
50:15And then the process continue the recent tradition of a body
50:20slamming Katanji Brown Jackson's insanity to because no, justice
50:24Jackson, this is nothing like the ADA.
50:29The Americans with Disabilities Act.
50:34I need to go hug my wife, man.
50:40The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American
50:45Family Association or American Family Radio.

Transcript indexed for search. Open the panel to read along.

Share this episode

Related Episodes

May 7, 2026

Constitutional Law
Bible & Theology

There has been much MAGA conversation, but not as much discussion about what originally made America great.

0:00 - 15:00. Psalm 20:5-8. We, the U.S.A., should know better than anyone that boasting in chariots and horsemen is a fool’s errand. 15:00 - 31:00. There has been much MAGA conversation, but not as m…

Listen

Jan 14, 2026

Marriage & Family
Constitutional Law
Politics & Policy
Bible & Theology

The stupid stick strikes broadly from SCOTUS to Capitol Hill.

0:00 - 15:00. Romans 1:18-22. Idiocy isn’t merely intellectual deficiency. It flows from spiritual spoilage. 15:00 - 31:00. The stupid stick strikes broadly from SCOTUS to Capitol Hill. 31:00 - 48:00.…

Listen

Nov 21, 2024

Election Integrity
Constitutional Law
Bible & Theology

Dania Yadago Andraos steps into “The Corner” to discuss Operation Christmas Child. National Collection week is November 18th - 25th.

0:00 - 15:00. Psalm 16:1-2. Where on our priority list is glorifying the eternal King of Heaven and Earth? 15:00 - 31:00. Dania Yadago Andraos steps into “The Corner” to discuss Operation Christmas Ch…

Listen

Subscribe and never miss an episode.

Pick Your Platform All Episodes

Call (888) 589-8840 Book Abe